Mindweapons in Ragnarok has succumbed to the feminine imperative. Its gracious host (no sarcasm intended) today notified all male commenters that they must treat female commenters as more equal than others.
Mindweapons now has its own Overton Window, calibrated to female sensitivities. This is not a win.
Do you allow men to make sexually insulting remarks to women in your household?
I replied to Mindweapons and to a few other commenters, but my replies have gone down the memory hole. It seems I am banned.
Here is a reconstruction of what I said to MW:
You are equating women you don’t know in real life who comment on your blog to women in my household. This helps my case, not yours.
Your blog, your rules. I do think you are right to ban anyone whose speech you find foul; I worry that this is a dangerous path, that by allowing women to define polite discourse, we invite microaggressions.com. Your goddesses will smother the invaluable discussion on this invaluable blog.
In response to my first comment, Trainspotter said:
We’re here to secure the existence of our people. MW’s actions are entirely consistent with that.
I replied “Presuming you reject the premise that Women Ruin Everything”.
“Liberators”, one of the men targeted by the original post, responded to Trainspotter as well, accusing Mindweapons of AMOGing the rest of us. He signed off with “Fuck you/ban me.” Wish granted. Mindweapons had previously lauded this commenter for his mindweaponry. Alas, it appears the feminine imperative sweeps all before it. The efficacy of white men is nullified by the offense they give to aryan goddesses.
Think of it as privatizing the police. You get 24/7 protection from the only people who actually care if you get raped.
Men’s sexuality, absent civilizational constraint, is naturally aggressive and promiscuous. These men laughing at a woman’s “taco”, grabbing ass, and doing pelvic-thrusts, are acting out their natural sexuality.
At one point in our society, this would have been unacceptable behaviour. Under the old order, lovingly referred to as the patriarchy, but probably more accurately referred to as civilization, civility towards woman was standard; it was called chivalry.
Men raised under this order would have been loath to issue even a mild oath in the presence of a woman, let alone crassly harass a woman over her “tacos”. Had a man been uncivilized enough to harass a woman in such a way, he would have suffered immediate consequences in the form of violence from other honourable men, and more permanent consequences from a loss of social status.
The particular form of pornography marketed to women celebrates rape, or even better, rape transfigured into unrape because the heroine secretly longed for the anti-hero. In contrast, patriarchy is boring and predictable. There are potatoes and diapers and funerals. What honest woman wants to deal with that?
Here, for your amusement, I present some envious old harpy responding to my old post about how I psychologically abused my wife into losing weight and being happy.
This has got to be one of the funniest, most egotistical things I have read in a long time. Thank you for the laugh!
For the record I am not for obesity as it is unhealthy, but to be so vain about it is just a testament to how small you are as a man. To try and perfect her physical looks, when you are clearly not sexy yourself… LMAO. You should rename this thread “Narcissistic Proof, you can dominate your wife back to the 1950′s!”
All I get from this thread (other than a hearty laugh) is a bunch of Narcissistic men who are brainwashing their wives into being spineless twigs, so that they may have something to brag about. Usually this type of male behavior stems from “Tiny member syndrome” .
Since we are perfecting your wife for your own benefit how about we fix you up for her? I see you have a bold spot, can we get some hair club for men going on? How about a better job? I can see by the house behind you that you live in a somewhat run down area. We need to set up some muscle building exercises for you as well, the stick man look is not attractive, but I am sure your wife loves you enough to tell you it is.
I totally need to make my own Husband perfecting rules to live by…
I hope some day your wife regains her brain and uses her new sexy body to find an equally attractive male who really appreciates her.
My friend Hump has made a huge decision. He explains:
My parents don’t love me they way they want me to believe they love me. They are toxic. They demand I live they way they want me to. Their love has always been conditional. I’m broken in part because of my relationship with them. Since cutting them off I’ve been able to identify some thoughts as “being theirs” and “not being mine”. I’m not fixed but I see some things more clearly.
My parents have enlisted their friends in telling me stories about how much I will regret cutting my parents off. People I don’t know are friending me on facebook telling me stories and giving me advice. People who don’t like me are texting me and calling me wanting to catch up and see how I’m doing. Bullshit. This is my mother’s work. This is what she does. She manipulates people.
I found an old self-comment that deserves promotion:
The ALPHA/BETA axis [Vox Day's capitalization], a.k.a. masculine/emasculated, a.k.a. attractiveness-to-women, can be broken down into three further factors: the intrinsic, the extrinsic, and the idiosyncratic.
The third factor, idiosyncratic, concerns an individual woman’s particular taste in men. It does not work in isolation, rather acting as an intensifier of attraction for which the ground work is already laid. E.g. blond hair, muscle-men.
The extrinsic factor refers to attraction generated by circumstance external to the man’s character and appearance. E.g. fame, wealth, “social proof”.
The intrinsic factor concerns the masculine virtues of the man himself. E.g. “inner game”, confidence, self-sufficiency, violent tendencies.